Elden Ring: who decided you want to be Elden Lord?
Elden Ring (FromSoftware, 2022) begins with you dead, or nearly. A Tarnished, exiled, stripped of grace. Then grace returns, that golden thread on the ground pointing the way, and a voice informs you of your goal: restore the Elden Ring and become Elden Lord. Notice that nobody asked you anything. You wake up inside a mission that was already written, holding a title that existed before you did, and spend a hundred hours chasing it.
A goal that arrived pre-assembled
It is easy not to find this strange, because games always hand you a goal. But Elden Ring insists on the point far too much for it to be accidental. Grace is literally a golden finger on the ground telling you where to go. The characters repeat the script. The title of Elden Lord is a vacancy, and several demigods are competing for the same vacancy, each convinced this is what he wants. The whole game is made of people chasing a position the Order has defined as the desirable one.
Man's desire is the desire of the Other
Lacan has a formula that works almost as a summary of the game: man’s desire is the desire of the Other. It appears in Seminar XI, from 1964, and operates in more than one sense at once. First, we desire to be recognised, we want to occupy a place in the eyes of the Other. Second, and more uncomfortably, we desire what we suppose the Other desires. The Other here is not the neighbour, it is the instance that was already there when we arrived: language, law, family, culture. What we call “my goals” usually comes with a label of origin nobody has read.
Elden Ring stages this with rare clarity. You did not desire the Elden Ring, you were summoned by it. Grace is not yours, it is a blessing granted and withdrawn by the Order. Even the name of your role, Tarnished, is a definition by lack: you are defined by what the Order says you are missing. The game hands you a ready-made desire and you put it on.
The Golden Order as law
The Golden Order is not merely the setting's religion, it is the law that organises the world, and it organises what may be desired within it. It decides what counts as life and what counts as aberration, what is order and what is tainted. The Omen are born with horns and are therefore locked in the sewers, not because they harm anyone, but because they do not fit the classification. That is law operating at its most brutal, not as a rule of conduct but as a criterion for what has the right to exist.
Marika, Radagon and the split law
And here comes the game's most interesting find. The figure who embodies the law is Marika, and the revelation that Marika and Radagon share one body splits that figure down the middle. The instance that was supposed to guarantee everything is itself divided, contradictory, in conflict with itself. It was Marika, after all, who shattered the Elden Ring. The one who upholds the law is the one who broke it.
This is not a plot detail, it is the heart of the matter. A growing child discovers, sooner or later, that the authority which handed down the rules is not coherent: it fails, contradicts itself, breaks its own rules. The famous law of the father is not the law of a perfect father, it is a function occupied by someone flawed. Discovering this disappoints and liberates in equal measure, because from that point on the rule stops being nature and becomes something that can be argued with.
The endings are positions towards the Order
It is no coincidence that the endings of Elden Ring are, in practice, positions towards the law. You can restore the Order as it was, patching the world back into its old shape. You can alter it at one point, keeping the structure and swapping the principle. Or you can hand it to the Frenzied Flame and burn everything, including the possibility of any order at all. Obey, reform or destroy. It is a reasonably honest map of the exits available to anyone who inherited a world they did not choose.
The question that remains
The sharpest thing Elden Ring does is not giving you freedom, it is showing you how much of your desire arrived pre-assembled. And the question it leaves behind holds outside the game, for careers, for the plans we swear are our own, for the life being built at considerable cost: that goal you have been chasing for years, did you arrive at it, or did you wake up already running after it with a golden grace pointing the way? The answer is not always comfortable. But asking is already stepping slightly out of autopilot, which is roughly all one can ask for.
Related
Death Stranding: a world without the Name-of-the-Father Why do we love the villain? The psychoanalysis of the dark sideReferences
Lacan, J. Seminar XI, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (1964): man's desire is the desire of the Other. · Freud, S. Totem and Taboo (1913): law founded on the figure of the father.
Comments
What did you think of this piece? Agree, disagree, have another reading of the game? Drop a comment below, I read them all and love keeping the conversation going. 👇